Frank van Leth

Associate Professor Health Sciences

Risk Factors for Smear Negative And Culture Positive Results Among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Mwanza, Tanzania


Journal article


Å. B. Andersen, F. V. Leth, P. Magnussen, Mugomela Apolinary, H. Friis, M. Tanzania
The Open Tropical Medicine Journal, 2008

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Andersen, Å. B., Leth, F. V., Magnussen, P., Apolinary, M., Friis, H., & Tanzania, M. (2008). Risk Factors for Smear Negative And Culture Positive Results Among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Mwanza, Tanzania. The Open Tropical Medicine Journal.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Andersen, Å. B., F. V. Leth, P. Magnussen, Mugomela Apolinary, H. Friis, and M. Tanzania. “Risk Factors for Smear Negative And Culture Positive Results Among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Mwanza, Tanzania.” The Open Tropical Medicine Journal (2008).


MLA   Click to copy
Andersen, Å. B., et al. “Risk Factors for Smear Negative And Culture Positive Results Among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Mwanza, Tanzania.” The Open Tropical Medicine Journal, 2008.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{b2008a,
  title = {Risk Factors for Smear Negative And Culture Positive Results Among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Mwanza, Tanzania},
  year = {2008},
  journal = {The Open Tropical Medicine Journal},
  author = {Andersen, Å. B. and Leth, F. V. and Magnussen, P. and Apolinary, Mugomela and Friis, H. and Tanzania, M.}
}

Abstract

Background: Smear negative and culture positive results in pulmonary tuberculosis are not uncommon yet the underlying factors are not well established. Objective: To determine factors associated with smear negative and culture positive results. Methods: Pulmonary tuberculosis patients were consecutively recruited for 12 months from five health facilities in Mwanza region, Tanzania. Sputum examinations were done at the recruitment centre and at the TB reference laboratory using Auramine O technique. Culture was done at the TB reference laboratory using Lowenstein Jensen solid media. A post-hoc analysis compared patients who had a smear negative culture positive result (case) with patients who had not (controls). Results: A total of 655 pulmonary TB patients were recruited, 18 had no culture results and were excluded from the analy- sis. Of the remaining 637 patients, 127 (19.9%) had three negative smears at the recruitment centre and 34 patients were a case. Current smoking was strongly associated with being a case, especially in women. Of the 127 patients who had three negative smears at the recruitment center, 104 (81.9%) also had a negative smear at the reference laboratory. Of these, 13 (12.5%) were still culture positive. Conclusion: The frequencies of smear-negative culture-positive results differ between health facilities, indicating possible difference in quality of laboratory procedures. Strengthening of laboratory capacity is needed both for optimizing smear microscopy techniques, and for performing sputum cultures for diagnosing TB when there is a high rate of suspicion. The association between smoking and smear negative culture positive TB needs to be assessed in adequately large studies.